Marita here, today I want to talk about making a goal board or vision board. It?s easy: you add your intentions or goals in form of images and affirmations to a poster board. If you make a goal board to achieve health and fitness goals you can do it in a few steps. It?s a good idea to keep a daily journal, it will help you keep track of what?s important and help you focus on your goals.
?
?First you want to clarify what exactly the goals are. One could be to loose 10 pounds. If you want to be more exact you can state by when you want to lose the 10 pounds.
Or you want to start a regular exercise program to be more flexible, toned and fit. Set yourself the intention: how many times a week can you go to the gym or to a yoga class, walking, biking, dancing or other exercise. Find something that?s fun and stick to it!
In order to feel good and be healthy,? it?s important to eat lots of vegetables, fruit, chicken and fish. Try to minimize, alcohol, coffee, sweets and fast foods. You don?t have to be fanatic. But if you do all these steps you will feel good,?look good and? be fit.
Now that you have your goals, find the images that represent those goals and the affirmations or words and glue them onto the board. If you can?t find the right words, type it up and print it, or write them with markers.
When finished put the goal board, where you can see it all the time, print a smaller version and have it in your car and wallet, in your phone, or as wallpaper on your computer. Visualize yourself fit and healthy, visualize, visualize and visualize!
The key is to keep your unconscious reminded of your? goals.? It will do whatever it can to find ways to achieve your goals for you. It works like a billboard, trust the process! I know, I have been there myself, I make goal boards for every aspect of my life. A few years ago I lost about 40 pounds, by changing my diet and sticking to a regular exercise program. It now is a new habit to eat healthier and move my body.
Are you ready for something new?? Become a member, learn about creating your life and your-self and do it in a supportive community!
click here to join Creative Life Now, my new membership site for women
?Nourish your spirit? is the motto. Learn how to find joy and fulfillment in life, in a community of like minded women. Click the blue link, or the image to join Creative Life Now. Are you looking for, support, friends, ideas, tips, motivation and inspiration? You are in the right place the subjects are: Creativity as meditation and a way of life, all about Vision Boards, Collages and Creative Writing. Let?s support each other and share ideas. This site is a melting pot of experts in the fields of Creativity and Healing, Vision boards, Collages and Creative Writing and women seeking expert advice and inspiration.
www.401kvsira.info ? Before we begin discussing about what is the biggest difference between 401K and IRA retirement plans it is advisable that we understand the concept of Roth 401K retirement plan that has recently come into formulation. Almost all of us are well aware of the traditional 401K, traditional IRA and Roth IRA plans but many of us still do not understand what Roth 401K exactly offers to the investors. 401K is a perfect blend of the traditional 401K and the Roth IRA. This retirement plan aids in providing the investors the best benefits. Since it is the newest form of investment plan that has popped up just a few years back it certainly interests a majority of people. With the provision of Roth 401K plans you are not entitled to an upfront tax deduction as well as the account continues to grow without any tax deductions. In addition to this you even enjoy a tax free withdrawal but you need to be at least 59. 5 years of age at that particular time and you should have held the account for a minimum period of 5 years. Click Here To Learn More ? www.401kvsira.info
Lesson I?m Learning From Within The Elevation Group (category: elevation group)
Study shows consumers need more guidance about fish consumption choicesPublic release date: 1-Jun-2012 [ | E-mail | Share ]
Contact: Tom Langford tlangford@partners.org 617-534-1605 Brigham and Women's Hospital
Brigham and Women's Hospital researchers lead a novel evaluation of the factors that influence fish consumption in the United States
Boston, MA In a first-of-its kind summary of fish consumption choices, a team of researchers from Brigham and Women's Hospital has determined that consumers are not getting all the information they need to make informed decisions about fish consumption. Their research is published in the June 1 issue of Environmental Health Perspectives.
The researchers, led by Susan Korrick, MD and Emily Oken, MD of Brigham and Women's Hospital (BWH), summarized the issue of fish consumption choice from toxicological, nutritional, ecological, and economic points of view through evaluation of the scientific literature, public health guidelines and fish consumption advisories made in the United Sates. They found that there is no one place that gives consumers a complete view of the advantages and disadvantages of various fish species. "Our research shows that there is no one perfect fish when considering nutritional value, toxicity rates and the environmental and economic impact," said Oken. "Consumers are forced to decide what tradeoffs they are willing to make. But as a consumer standing in a store, it is difficult to understand the pros and cons of a fish purchase, because the amount of readily available information is limited."
"Our research highlights the need for the development of clear and simple consumer advice that describes the multiple impacts of fish consumption," said Korrick. "Despite caveats, fish is generally a healthy food; the challenge is providing advice that is both comprehensive and accessible so consumers don't give up eating fish out of frustration."
Additionally, researchers also emphasize the need for policy and fishery management interventions to ensure long term availability of fish as an important source of human nutrition.
###
This study was funded by a Dartmouth College Superfund Research Program Grant, a Dartmouth Formative Children's Center Grant, the National Institutes of Health (R01 ES 016314), the Harvard Clinical Nutrition Research Center, the Gelfond Fund for Mercury Research & Outreach, the Consortium for Interdisciplinary Environmental Research, SUNY Stony Brook, the Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, the Swiss National Science Foundation, the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences and the United States Environmental Protection Agency.
This study is a companion to a study led by Dartmouth researcher Margaret Karagas, Ph.D. which examines the current scientific evidence for effects of low-level exposures to methylmercury on neurological and other human health outcomes and also appears in the June 1 issue of Environmental Health Perspectives. Both papers resulted from the Coastal and Marine Mercury Ecosystem Research Collaborative.
[ | E-mail | Share ]
?
AAAS and EurekAlert! are not responsible for the accuracy of news releases posted to EurekAlert! by contributing institutions or for the use of any information through the EurekAlert! system.
Study shows consumers need more guidance about fish consumption choicesPublic release date: 1-Jun-2012 [ | E-mail | Share ]
Contact: Tom Langford tlangford@partners.org 617-534-1605 Brigham and Women's Hospital
Brigham and Women's Hospital researchers lead a novel evaluation of the factors that influence fish consumption in the United States
Boston, MA In a first-of-its kind summary of fish consumption choices, a team of researchers from Brigham and Women's Hospital has determined that consumers are not getting all the information they need to make informed decisions about fish consumption. Their research is published in the June 1 issue of Environmental Health Perspectives.
The researchers, led by Susan Korrick, MD and Emily Oken, MD of Brigham and Women's Hospital (BWH), summarized the issue of fish consumption choice from toxicological, nutritional, ecological, and economic points of view through evaluation of the scientific literature, public health guidelines and fish consumption advisories made in the United Sates. They found that there is no one place that gives consumers a complete view of the advantages and disadvantages of various fish species. "Our research shows that there is no one perfect fish when considering nutritional value, toxicity rates and the environmental and economic impact," said Oken. "Consumers are forced to decide what tradeoffs they are willing to make. But as a consumer standing in a store, it is difficult to understand the pros and cons of a fish purchase, because the amount of readily available information is limited."
"Our research highlights the need for the development of clear and simple consumer advice that describes the multiple impacts of fish consumption," said Korrick. "Despite caveats, fish is generally a healthy food; the challenge is providing advice that is both comprehensive and accessible so consumers don't give up eating fish out of frustration."
Additionally, researchers also emphasize the need for policy and fishery management interventions to ensure long term availability of fish as an important source of human nutrition.
###
This study was funded by a Dartmouth College Superfund Research Program Grant, a Dartmouth Formative Children's Center Grant, the National Institutes of Health (R01 ES 016314), the Harvard Clinical Nutrition Research Center, the Gelfond Fund for Mercury Research & Outreach, the Consortium for Interdisciplinary Environmental Research, SUNY Stony Brook, the Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, the Swiss National Science Foundation, the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences and the United States Environmental Protection Agency.
This study is a companion to a study led by Dartmouth researcher Margaret Karagas, Ph.D. which examines the current scientific evidence for effects of low-level exposures to methylmercury on neurological and other human health outcomes and also appears in the June 1 issue of Environmental Health Perspectives. Both papers resulted from the Coastal and Marine Mercury Ecosystem Research Collaborative.
[ | E-mail | Share ]
?
AAAS and EurekAlert! are not responsible for the accuracy of news releases posted to EurekAlert! by contributing institutions or for the use of any information through the EurekAlert! system.
Dear Savvy Senior: I'll be 65 in a few months -- Medicare enrollment age -- and am interested in getting a Medicare Advantage plan to cover my health care and prescription drugs. Can you give me some advice on choosing a plan?
--Searching Senior
Dear Searching: Medicare Advantage plans have become increasingly popular among retirees over the past few years. In fact, around one-fourth of all Medicare recipients -- nearly 13 million Americans -- are currently enrolled in a Medicare Advantage plan. Here are some tips and tools to help you choose the best plan for you.
Medicare Advantage
Sometimes called Medicare Part C, Medicare Advantage plans are government-approved health plans sold by private insurance companies that you can choose in place of original Medicare. The vast majority of Advantage plans are managed-care policies such as HMOs or PPOs that require you to get your care within a network of providers.
If you join an Advantage plan, the plan will provide all of your Part A (hospital insurance) and Part B (medical insurance) coverage; some plans even offer extra benefits like vision, dental and hearing. And, most plans include Part D prescription drug coverage too.
You also need to be aware that the monthly premiums for many Advantage plans are cheaper than if you got original Medicare, plus a separate Part D drug plan and a Medigap policy, but their deductibles and co-pays are usually higher. That makes these plans better suited for healthier retirees.
How to Choose
To help you choose a plan, a good first step is to call your doctors and find out which Advantage plans they accept, and which ones they recommend. Then go to the Medicare Plan Finder tool and compare those options. When comparing, here are some key points to consider:
Total costs: Look at the plan's entire pricing package, not just the premiums and deductibles. Compare the out-of-pocket maximums plus the copays and coinsurance charged for doctor office visits, hospital stays, diagnostic tests, visits to specialists, prescription drugs and other medical services. This is very important because if you choose an Advantage plan, you're not allowed to purchase a Medigap supplement policy, which means you'll be responsible for paying these expenses out of your own pocket.
Drug coverage: Check the plan's formulary -- the list of prescription drugs covered - to be sure all the medications you take are covered without excessive co-pays or requirements that you try less expensive drugs first.
Extra benefits: Many Advantage plans include dental, vision and hearing benefits, but they are often limited. Get the details on what exactly is covered.
Out-of-network coverage: Since most Advantage plans limit you to using in-network doctors only, find out what's covered if you have an emergency outside your network area. This is especially important if you travel extensively or live part of the year outside your network.
Locations: If you don't use any particular doctors and you live in a rural area, make sure the doctors in the plans you're considering are located near you. Also check to see if the hospitals, home health agencies and skilled nursing facilities that the plan covers are nearby too.
Retiree benefits: If you have coverage from a former employer, be sure you speak with the benefits manager, because signing up for Medicare Advantage may void your retiree coverage.
Get Help
If you don't have a computer to compare plans, or if you don't feel comfortable working through this information on you own, you can get help by calling Medicare at 800-633-4227. They can do the comparing for you over the phone, and enroll you in a plan when you're ready.
Another good resource is your State Health Insurance Assistance Program, which provides free Medicare counseling. Visit shiptalk.org, or call 800-677-1116 to locate a counselor in your area. And, check out the HealthMetrix Research "Cost Share Report" at medicarenewswatch.com. This service chooses the best Advantage plans based on health status.
Send your senior questions to: Savvy Senior, P.O. Box 5443, Norman, OK 73070, or visit SavvySenior.org. Jim Miller is a contributor to the NBC Today show and author of "The Savvy Senior" book.
We were unable to forward you to the advertisement you clicked on.
The likely cause for this is that your browser, feed reader, or email application is configured to not accept cookies, or your reader may launch an external browser to view links without sharing cookies.
If you're using Internet Explorer, make sure your privacy setting is at medium or below.
Select 'Internet Options' from the 'Tools' menu in your browser window
Click the Privacy tab
Adjust your privacy setting if necessary ?
If you're using a reader that embeds Internet Explorer (examples: Microsoft Outlook, Outlook Express, Feed Demon), you'll also need to select Internet Explorer as your default web browser.
Open Internet Explorer
Select 'Internet Options' from the 'Tools' menu in your browser window
Click the 'Programs' tab and check the box for Internet Explorer to check if it is the default browser and save your change
Close your browser, re-open it, and when prompted, select Internet Explorer as your default
You can then click on an ad in your newsletter and visit the site you wish to view
Showcasing more than fifty of the most provocative, original, and significant online essays from 2011, The Best Science Writing Online 2012 will change the way...
Read More??
Almost 100 years ago Margaret Sanger opened a tiny birth-control clinic in the Brownsville section of Brooklyn, N.Y. Poor Yiddish- and Italian-speaking women, overwhelmed by large families that they could not support, would come for advice about how to avoid pregnancy and the dangers of horrific, sometimes life-threatening, self-administered abortions. The clinic taught women to use the diaphragm. Nine days after it opened, Sanger and two other women who ran the center were jailed for violating a New York State law that prohibited contraception.
This clinic eventually grew into Planned Parenthood, the nation?s largest nonprofit supplier of reproductive health services to women and men. A century after its founding, the organization is again at the heart of one of the most divisive issues in American political life. It has come under attack by Republican presidential candidates seeking to revoke the group?s federal funding?almost half of its $1-billion budget comes from federal and state sources. Last year the House of Representatives voted to withdraw some of its support, although the measure was not sustained in the Senate. (Backing for the group, initiated under the Nixon administration, has not always been a partisan issue.) In March, Mitt Romney, the GOP?s presumptive presidential candidate, vowed to end federal funding if elected. This is a worrying prospect for both women and public health.
For some people, Planned Parenthood has come to symbolize abortion, which it has provided since 1970. But in all the rhetoric, facts have sometimes gone missing. For instance, Senator Jon Kyl of Arizona declared last year on the floor of the Senate that abortion accounts for ?well over 90 percent? of what Planned Parenthood does. The actual figure is 3 percent. (Planned Parenthood clinics perform one in four abortions in the U.S. but use no federal funds for this practice.) To some abortion opponents, that 3 percent is reason enough to gut the organization. If a future Congress and White House were to do so, however, it would drive women once again into the back alleys, without necessarily decreasing the number of abortions.
Stripping Planned Parenthood of federal funding would also sacrifice the 97 percent of its public health work that has nothing to do with abortion, from which many people benefit directly. One in five American women have used the group?s services, and three out of four of its patients are considered to have low incomes. In 2011 it carried out tests and treatment for more than four million individuals with sexually transmitted diseases. It supplied 750,000 exams to prevent breast cancer, the most common cancer among U.S. women. And it performed 770,000 Pap tests to prevent cervical cancer, which was a leading cause of death among women before this screen became widely available. Planned Parenthood is one of the most important public health care institutions in the country, even aside from its work in rational family planning.
Family planning has benefited society in numerous ways. It has saved lives, opened new horizons for women and kept populations from soaring. Since 1965, the year the Supreme Court struck down a Connecticut law that made access to contraception illegal, women?s ability to plan and space out pregnancies has contributed to a 60 percent decline in maternal deaths. By 2002, moreover, only 9 percent of births were unwanted, compared with 20 percent in the early 1960s. As a major provider of contraceptives?it furnished birth control to two million Americans last year?Planned Parenthood serves as ?America?s largest abortion preventer,? as one Chicago Tribune writer pointed out.
?Access to birth control in the U.S. has helped narrow the income inequality gap between men and women by as much as 30 percent during the 1990s alone. The pill has given women greater choice about when to have children, freeing them up to acquire career skills. By 2009 women procured more than half of all U.S. doctoral degrees, compared with 10 percent in 1960. The health and well-being of a society correlates highly with the status of its women. In many parts of the Middle East, Asia and Africa, women are now making gains, to the betterment of all, in access to education and jobs?both contingent on family planning. Now is a particularly bad time for Americans, as citizens of the world, to forget what we have accomplished at home.