Monday, January 21, 2013

French troops take central Mali towns, rebels slip away

DIABALY, Mali (Reuters) - French and Malian armored columns rolled into the towns of Diabaly and Douentza in central Mali on Monday after the al Qaeda-linked rebels who had seized them fled into the bush to avoid air strikes.

France said the advance was a significant step in its campaign to break Islamist fighters' grip over Mali's vast desert north, a presence raising fears of the region becoming a an African launchpad for international militant attacks.

The stakes in Mali rose dramatically last week when Islamist gunmen cited France's intervention as the reason for attacking a gas plant in neighboring Algeria, seizing hundreds of hostages and sowing fears the conflict would spill across borders.

"This advance by Mali's army into towns held by their enemies is a clear military success for the government in Bamako and for French forces supporting the operation," French Defense Minister Jean-Yves Le Drian said.

France, which has made 140 bombing sorties since January 11, plans eventually to hand over the military operation to a U.N.-sanctioned African mission - although that deployment has been hampered by a lack of supplies, funds and training.

Diabaly, 350 km (220 miles) north of Mali's dusty riverside capital Bamako, had harbored the main cluster of insurgents south of the frontline towns of Mopti and Sevare.

Douentza, some 800 km from Bamako along the eastern road to the rebel stronghold of Gao, was a staging post in the rebels' southward advance two weeks ago that prompted France to intervene for fear they would capture the Malian capital.

In Diabaly, the dusty streets were now littered with the charred wreckage of eight rebel pick-up trucks. Residents said 200 Islamist fighters had held them captive for three days as human shields against French air strikes.

"There were 12 of us in the house, with no food or water," said 18-year-old Seydou Diarra. "They stopped us from leaving the village. They told us we'll die together and those who insisted on leaving were unbelievers."

Malian soldiers proudly displayed some 80 boxes of machine gun ammunition left behind by the fleeing rebels. Life gradually returned to the town's main street as shops reopened and children played on the parade ground where French and Malian troops parked their armored personnel carriers.

France has sent 2,150 ground troops to Mali and deployed jet fighters and attack helicopters that hammered rebel bases for an 11th day on Monday, as it awaited troops from nearby African nations, pouring into Bamako, to deploy to the front line.

Some 1,000 African troops from the West African regional bloc ECOWAS and the central African nation of Chad have arrived, and that number is expected to top 5,000 in the coming weeks.

Military experts say the swift and effective deployment of African forces is crucial to sustain the momentum of France's air campaign and prevent Islamists from melting away into the empty desert or the rugged mountains near the Algerian border.

FOREST CAMPS

The Islamist alliance in Mali groups al Qaeda's North African wing AQIM and the Malian militant groups Ansar Dine and MUJWA. It has imposed harsh sharia, meting out amputations and destroying ancient shrines sacred to moderate Sufi Muslims.

France aims to sweep the Islamists from northern Mali, an area the size of Texas, to prevent them using it as a base to mount attacks on the West or coordinate with other Islamist militants such as Nigeria's Boko Haram and Somalia's al Shabaab.

Paris aims to hand over the military operation to the U.N.-mandated African-led International Support Mission to Mali (AFISMA) "as quickly as possible. Until that happens, we shall do our duty," President Francois Hollande said on Monday.

"We know that's going to take time."

The Algerian hostage-taking, claimed by veteran jihadist Mokhtar Belmokhtar in the name of al Qaeda, has placed Mali conflict firmly on the agenda of Western capitals.

Belmokhtar's Mulathameen Brigade warned of further attacks on foreign interests unless France halted its intervention.

Algeria said 37 foreigners - including seven Japanese, four Britons, a Frenchman and an American - were killed during the hostage taking, ended with an assault by its security forces.

Britain, whose nationals were among those caught up in the hostage crisis, said on Monday it would increase counter-terrorism and intelligence aid to Algeria and consider giving more help to France to fight the Mali rebels. But it ruled out any direct British military intervention in Africa.

Addressing parliament, British Prime Minister David Cameron said a "patient, intelligent, but tough" approach was the best way to defeat terrorism. He stressed the "long-standing and deep" root causes of terrorism and pledged to help foster democracy and the rule of law in places at risk of Islamist militancy.

Egypt, however, warned that military intervention in Mali would aggravate strife in Africa and risk alienating the rest of the continent from its Arab north.

"The intervention must be peaceful and developmental and funds must be spent on development," Egyptian President Mohamed Mursi, a freely elected Islamist, told an Arab development conference in Saudi Arabia.

The United States sent its first flight bringing logistical support on Sunday but has no plans to send combat troops.

France has appealed for international donors to help fund the African mission at a conference on January 29. The European Union also said it would host a meeting on Mali on February 5, with the support of the United Nations and the African Union.

REBELS DRIFT AWAY

In recent days, Islamists have melted into the scrubland of central Mali, preferring not to engage directly with Malian and French troops. Residents of Diabaly said some rebels had doffed their flowing robes to blend in with the population, raising fears of ambushes and booby traps left behind in captured towns.

A resident of Timbuktu told Reuters by satellite telephone on Monday that scores of pick-up trucks carrying Islamist fighters had arrived there since Saturday, as the rebels apparently pulled their forces back to their desert strongholds.

The push northward by the Malian army has raised the specter of ethnic reprisals by security forces and militia groups. Human Rights Watch said it had received reports of serious abuses being committed by the Malian army against civilians in Niono.

There have also been reports of killings by Malian soldiers of lighter-skinned Arabs and Tuaregs, who are widely blamed for the rebellion that swept northern Mali.

In Diabaly, angry residents said the rebels had been led there by former army soldiers led by a local Tuareg captain who had deserted to join the Islamists.

"Only a person who knows Diabaly very well would have been able to bring them here," said Diabaly Mayor Oumar Diakite.

(Additional reporting by Adama Diarra and Tiemoko Diallo in Bamako, Vicky Buffery, John Irish and Elizabeth Pineau in Paris, Mohammed Abbas in London; Writing by Richard Valdmanis; Editing by Daniel Flynn and Mark Heinrich)

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/french-troops-advance-mali-islamists-melt-away-095602962.html

pga tour Nora Ephron mario balotelli mario balotelli espn3 kevin youkilis Tropical Storm Debby

Flood And Earthquake Insurance: Can You Afford Without It? | Eric ...

Flood And Earthquake Insurance: Can You Afford Without It? Even in areas where purchasing flood and earthquake insurance is not mandated by the state, mortgage brokers and lenders can demand it of homeowners in order to protect their investment. The reason for this is simple. Both floods and earthquakes can inflict horrendous amounts of damage, meaning that those lending institutions can lose hope of recouping their loans in little more than an instant if the homes are not covered.

Of course, having flood and earthquake insurance is also a good thing for individual homeowners. For them, the main benefit of having said insurance lies in understanding that their finances are not going to be ruined should those disasters come to pass. Being insured means getting financial assistance with repairing damages and rebuilding lives. In contrast, receiving the bill for fixing damages caused by floods and earthquakes can seem like salt being smeared into open wounds.

Furthermore, the need for flood and earthquake insurance is rising because although the number of earthquakes have remained constant, there is real and disturbing evidence that incidences of flooding are on the rise in recent times.

How to Figure Out If Your Home Needs Flood And Earthquake Insurance

Each homeowner should consider his or her need for flood and earthquake insurance based on local conditions. There is no point in getting insurance for disasters if those disasters are either impossible or too improbable. After all, a man living deep inland is not going to need hurricane insurance because he is never going to see a hurricane.

Here are some tips for people to figure out if they need flood and earthquake insurance:

- First, homeowners should figure out if their area experiences the disaster in question. In general, doing so is as simple as going to the Internet and consulting a search engine, but consulting local offices of the National Weather Service or even local insurance companies can also prove helpful.

- After estimating the chance that their area will experience the disaster in question, homeowners should then attempt to estimate the damage that it could do, and how much it would cost them to fix said damage. Speaking to local contractors can prove helpful in figuring out repair costs, as can totaling up the value of the personal possessions that might be lost.

- Speak to local insurance companies to find out the homeowners insurance rates needed to cover such contingencies. Similarly, use a shopping comparison engine to shop around for the best prices. Once that is done, compare the cost of insurance to the expected damages of not being insured. For example, an estimate of a 10% chance of flooding each year multiplied by $20,000 in damages produces an expected outcome of $2,000 in damages. If it costs $500 per year to purchase full coverage for the flood, then it makes sense not to go uninsured.

- Consider alternatives to purchasing insurance. Renovating the home in order to reinforce it against disasters can reduce the expected damages to a point where it is preferable to purchasing insurance. It does this by reducing the damages in case the disaster strikes.

In the end, purchasing flood and earthquake insurance is the most convenient option for homeowners living in flood and earthquake-prone areas because it costs less than renovation. Ignoring the problem is simply not a sensible solution because the consequences of disaster striking are so severe.

Jeff Mathis is an insurance consultant. He likes sharing his knowledge online by writing for a variety of insurance blogs. Click the link for more homeowners insurance rates and quotes.

Source: http://www.ericfinance.com/flood-earthquake-insurance/

eminem yankees Tagg Romney Bosses Day Cabin Fever 2 Alexis Wright Zumba binder full of women

learning how to learn how to learn. phew. ? are for use

troy-abed-community-wide

I?m two weeks in. my thursday nights feel like an episode of community.

in between learning (faking) grant writing skills, i?m cramming my sidebag with books on the digital divide and learning in public libraries. i?m trying to figure out how many people have already answered my questions: how are libraries supporting informal and self-directed learning? how is adult education addressing the digital divide?

here is what i know: i know that public libraries play a huge role in informal learning for adults on the wrong side of the digital divide. if you don?t have a computer and can?t afford the internet, there is a good likelihood that you also not gainfully employed, not a university graduate, and/or english is not your first language (and judging by how i just mis-spelled ?enghishl? for a moment there, i?m thinking it might not be my first language today either).

i can?t say for certain where else folks are learning basic digital literacies. i know some adults are going to college and continuing education, but many can?t afford this route. i know a lot of adults are coming to the library to seek impromptu one-to-one tutoring, and this can be a little infuriating for everyone.

at my library i meet a lot of people who already have a really low tolerance for frustration around computers, and who aren?t terribly willing to understand that library staff have limited availability (yes, the library is actually a really busy place. we might not be sweating from the physical strain of it, but we are expected to do a lot with relatively little staffing and with very high expectations all around). often the help we can offer is a free course that starts in two months and is already full. admittedly not super helpful. we?ve got instructional dvds, visual and plain-language how-to books, and other methods for self-study. sometimes, when there?s no queue at the reference desk, we?ve got the time to come over and help an individual for five or twenty minutes ? but even this is not enough.

i think part of the problem is that self-directed learning does not come easy or naturally to many adults. many of us are just not exploratory people. after all, it?s frustrating to be alone with your own failures? er, learning process.

so now i?m wondering, is this part of the public library?s mandate? should we be teaching folks how to teach themselves? we are all about non-coercive learning, and teaching how-to-learn sounds suspiciously like school. i work at a public library and not a school because i want to avoid this sort of thing. i have pretty high hopes for humanity?s innate ability to learn, and i find traditional schooling to be oppressive to the learner. people want to learn. some people take longer than others to want to, and not everyone wants to learn the same things. we definitely don?t all learn with the same methods.

because we are each individual learners, classrooms don?t work. it doesn?t matter if someone teaches you, you have to do the learning. i heard all through high school how school was about ?teaching you how to learn?, but all it ever taught me was how to skip class, smoke cigarettes and lie. and i know some folks have really positive school experiences, and that the model somehow works for them. i am going to go out on an unsupported-by-science limb and speculate that the folks coming into the library having never used a mouse before were not taught you to learn.

so how can we support individual learners? yes, we provide the tools for study (books, media, and internet access). staff also provide a little bit of help. but how accessible are we really making these tools if learners don?t know how use them?

time to go read.

>> composed to a soundtrack of sonic youth, neutral milk hotel, and snoop doggy dogg and the fuel of delicious jj bean coffee.

Source: http://tamahoc.wordpress.com/2013/01/20/learning/

Kendrick Lamar Russell Means Taylor Swift Red Walking Dead Season 3 Episode 2 celiac disease san francisco giants Medal of Honor Warfighter

Sunday, January 20, 2013

Gun control 101: Why is Obama pushing for new gun research?

A key part of President Obama's plan to rein in gun violence is his push to kick-start fresh gun-control-related research by federal agencies. Republicans have blocked such research in the past.

By Peter Grier,?Staff writer / January 19, 2013

President Barack Obama, accompanied by Vice President Joe Biden, talks at the White House in Washington Wednesday about proposals to reduce gun violence.

Carolyn Kaster/AP

Enlarge

This week President Obama outlined a sweeping package of proposed changes to America?s gun laws, including a federal ban on the manufacture and sale of new assault weapons and an expansion of background checks on firearm purchasers. But proponents of gun control say one of the most important pieces of the plan may be a smaller, less-noticed move: Mr. Obama?s attempt to end a 15-year ban on federal research into guns and violence.

Skip to next paragraph

' + google_ads[0].line2 + '
' + google_ads[0].line3 + '

'; } else if (google_ads.length > 1) { ad_unit += ''; } } document.getElementById("ad_unit").innerHTML += ad_unit; google_adnum += google_ads.length; return; } var google_adnum = 0; google_ad_client = "pub-6743622525202572"; google_ad_output = 'js'; google_max_num_ads = '1'; google_feedback = "on"; google_ad_type = "text"; google_adtest = "on"; google_image_size = '230x105'; google_skip = '0'; // -->

For years, some members of Congress have effectively blocked the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and other federal agencies from conducting such research due to concerns about pro-gun control bias. On Wednesday, Obama said he?d use the powers of the presidency to change that situation.

?While year after year those who oppose even modest gun safety measures have threatened to defund scientific or medical research into the causes of gun violence, I will direct the Centers for Disease Control to go ahead and study the best ways to reduce it.... We don?t benefit from ignorance,? said Obama.

Here are some basic questions and answers about the research issue:

What's stopping the government from studying guns and violence?

In 1996 some conservative members of Congress mounted an effort to eliminate the CDC?s National Center for Injury Prevention and Control because they believed some researchers were cheerleaders for the anti-gun movement. In the end, they took the $2.6 million this center had spent on gun research the previous year, and earmarked it for brain-injury research. In addition, Congress added language to the CDC appropriation saying ?none of the funds made available for injury prevention and control at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention may be used to advocate or promote gun control.?

It?s unclear exactly what sorts of things this phrase prohibits. But no federal employee was willing to risk their career to find out, according to a December Journal of the American Medical Association article. Several years later, Congress made the language applicable to the Department of Health and Human Services, as well.

?Even today, 17 years after this legislative action, the CDC?s website lacks specific links to information about preventing firearm-related violence,? says the article by Arthur Kellermann and Frederick Rivara.

Generally speaking, gun-rights organizations oppose treating firearms as a public-health issue, as opposed to a constitutional right.

What don't we know?

Source: http://rss.csmonitor.com/~r/feeds/csm/~3/EE0EIDk2kwA/Gun-control-101-Why-is-Obama-pushing-for-new-gun-research

samuel adams snowy owl one for the money 10 minute trainer sarah burke death etta james funeral erin brockovich

Obama's campaign looks to legislative fights

WASHINGTON (AP) ? President Barack Obama's campaign racked up 332 electoral votes and helped the president win a second term. Now it hopes to score legislative victories and build the president's legacy.

Throngs of campaign volunteers and staff members gathered Sunday at a Washington hotel on the eve of Obama's Inauguration for a conference that served as both reunion and planning session for the next four years.

Recounting the success of the 2012 campaign, campaign officials vowed to use a new nonprofit called Organizing for Action to marshal support behind Obama's legislative agenda. The arrangement is unprecedented for a sitting president ? essentially transforming his re-election campaign into a nonprofit organization to back up his efforts in Congress.

"We know it is time to reform our broken immigration system, and we will get it done this year," said Jon Carson, a former White House official who will serve as OFA's executive director. "We are going to take it to them on reducing gun violence, on climate change. And we are going to take this network and finish some jobs that we started," he said, pointing to the sweeping health care law signed by Obama.

The conference, which took place as Obama was sworn into another term in a private ceremony at the White House, was the first gathering of activists who will form the backbone of the nonprofit group. The organization will be funded by grassroots donors and corporate money and function separately from the Democratic National Committee, the party's political arm.

For many volunteers and staffers, the conference and inaugural festivities also offered a chance to trade war stories and bask in the glow of Obama's re-election. Campaign manager Jim Messina walked onstage to a standing ovation, declaring to the faithful, "I see winners!"

Volunteers were asked to form local chapters of the group and take the organizing skills and technological know-how they learned from the campaign to support Obama's second term. Carson said the organization planned to make its mark quickly, previewing the upcoming fight over gun control in the aftermath of last month's deadly school shooting in Connecticut.

"There are dozens of districts in this country where Republicans have no business being proud of the fact that they're endorsed by the (National Rifle Association). And we will go to those districts, and we will run ads, and we will be on their Facebook pages," he said.

"We will go to those people in their districts who might not be too excited to hear that their member of Congress doesn't think we should pass an assault weapons ban or have background checks for everyone who wants to purchase a gun," Carson said. "We will take every lesson learned and create some new ones."

Campaign officials ticked off a series of numbers to emphasize their accomplishments ? 332 electoral votes, the registering of 1.8 million voters and more than 150 million door knocks and phone calls from volunteers. But speaker after speaker said it was more than numbers that re-elected a president.

"We are the most powerful room in America," said Sara El-Amine, the campaign's national training director. "Our legacy is not an email list. It's not a tech tool. It's not an analytics model. Our legacy is you."

___

Follow Ken Thomas on Twitter: http://twitter.com/AP_Ken_Thomas

Associated Press

Source: http://hosted2.ap.org/APDEFAULT/89ae8247abe8493fae24405546e9a1aa/Article_2013-01-20-Obama-Campaign/id-449ccbd536474c5faddbe6146b15ba03

kenyon martin kenyon martin big miracle slab city super bowl snacks appleton super bowl recipes

Jordan Islamists shun election, demand political reform

AMMAN (Reuters) - Jordanian Islamists, who will boycott next week's parliamentary election, called on Friday for a fairer electoral law and for political reforms that would end King Abdullah's power to choose governments.

About 2,000 Islamists and some tribesmen and leftists protested in Amman against Wednesday's vote for a new 150-seat assembly, which they said was meaningless given electoral rules that ensure Jordan's cities will be under-represented.

"Our people have no say. For the last two years, our masses have demanded change so that people will have real power to choose their rulers," Sheikh Hammam Said, the head of Jordan's Muslim Brotherhood, told the crowd.

"Don't impose your failed governments on people," he said, referring to King Abdullah. "These governments that have committed corruption should be held accountable. There is no legitimacy for any government not chosen by the people."

Activists at the protest in the capital waved banners reading "No to cosmetic elections that circumvent our reform demands" and "We are boycotting for the sake of change".

The boycott by Jordan's main opposition Islamic Action Front, the Muslim Brotherhood's political arm, threatens to undermine the legitimacy of the next parliament.

The Front announced last year it would shun the polls after the tribal-dominated parliament passed a electoral law that magnifies the voting clout of native Jordanian constituencies at the expense of cities, which are home to many citizens of Palestinian origin and which tend to be Islamist strongholds..

More than two thirds of Jordan's seven people live in cities but are allocated less than a third of assembly seats.

REFORM PLEDGES

The Islamist boycott has reduced the election to a contest between tribal leaders, establishment figures and independent businessmen, with just a few of the 1,500 candidates running for recognized parties. Allegations of vote-buying are rife.

King Abdullah said this week he wanted to move faster on promises of democratic reforms and supported the idea of governments whose prime minister would emerge from a majority bloc in parliament, rather than being handpicked by him.

"Our constitutional monarchy has changed," the king said.

However, the previous parliament had resisted attempts to increase the number of seats set aside for political party lists, seeing this as a threat to tribal interests.

Jordanians will go to the polls amid economic gloom only two months after steep fuel price rises ignited widespread civil unrest, mainly in tribal areas that traditionally support the monarchy and rely heavily on state employment and welfare.

Unlike some Arab countries, Jordan has avoided any full-scale uprising in the past two years, but demonstrators voiced unprecedented calls to end King Abdullah's rule during the price protests in November, which have since subsided.

Protests led by the Brotherhood and dissident tribesmen have mostly demanded free elections and a crackdown on corruption.

Prime Minister Abdullah Ensour said the "self-defeating" election boycott would cost the opposition a chance to win up to a quarter of assembly seats and to press their case from within.

"It's a pity they are boycotting. We tried to dissuade them but they chose this path," Ensour said in remarks published on Friday, adding that fair polls were crucial to restore credibility dented by vote-rigging in previous elections. (Editing by Alistair Lyon)

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/jordan-islamists-shun-election-demand-political-reform-162542204.html

obama trayvon martin pietrus cheney tori spelling marion barber marion barber syracuse

Attacks prompt Nepal wildlife cap

Officials in Nepal have said they will now have to put a cap in the growth of wildlife including endangered species like tigers and rhinos.

They say it is a result of significant increase in loss of human lives from attacks by wild animals.

The problem is especially acute in buffer zones between human settlements and national parks.

In recent years, Nepal has developed a successful protection programme for many endangered species.

Continue reading the main story

?Start Quote

The time has now come for us to determine how many such wildlife species we can have in our protected areas?

End Quote Krishna Acharya Forestry Ministry of Nepal

The Chitwan National Park in southern Nepal has more than 500 rhinos, up from half that figure few years ago, and more than 125 tigers.

The Bardiya National Park in the west now has more than 80 elephants, almost 10 times as many as there were in the 1990s.

In the Himalayas, the numbers of endangered species like snow leopards and red pandas have been growing as well.

And the country has nearly 24% of its land area as protected areas, including national parks, conservation areas and wildlife reserves.

With all these achievements in nature conservation, however, Nepal has also witnessed a rising number of human deaths and property losses because of wildlife.

In the last five years, more than 80 people have been killed by wild elephants while 17 of the animals died in retaliatory killings, according to forest ministry officials.

Elephant protest

Last month, local people in Chitwan, southern Nepal, staged a strike and demanded that a rogue elephant be killed after it had taken the lives of three people.

A few months ago, a leopard in western Nepal caused terror as it killed more than a dozen people within a matter of weeks.

In eastern Nepal, herds of wild elephants continue to rampage, demolishing human settlements and raiding crops.

Meanwhile, common leopards are increasingly attacking children and livestock in the hilly region.

Further north, in the trans-Himalayan region, locals continue to complain about snow leopards preying on their livestock.

Although forest ministry officials are yet to compile the latest data on these losses, they do admit that such incidents have gone up remarkably.

"Before, we used to record about 30 human deaths because of wildlife attacks annually but in the past few years the figure appears to have risen significantly," said Forest Ministry spokesman Krishna Acharya who, until recently, headed Nepal's Department of National Parks and Wildlife Conservation.

He added: "The time has now come for us to determine how many such wildlife species we can have in our protected areas."

WWF's Nepal country director, Anil Manandhar, said the problem had become quite serious.

"This is now something that could become the biggest threat and setback for Nepal's success in wildlife conservation," he explained.

Buffer zones

Wildlife experts say human settlements known as buffer zones around national parks have become flashpoints for human-wildlife encounters.

"The numbers of rhinos and tigers are increasing in the national park and they are moving out in search of food and space. Meanwhile, the increasing human population needs more of the natural resources available, and that competition creates conflict," said Mr Acharya.

Most of Nepal's national parks and protected areas are either in the Himalayan region or in the Tarai area, the southern plain land that border India.

Yet, wildlife-related loss of lives and properties are also increasingly being seen in the mid-hill region, geographically located between the Himalayas and Tarai plain land.

Conservationists point at the growing number of attacks on children and livestock by common leopards because this region has seen huge success in community forestry.

"We have been hearing complaints from farmers that community forests have more wildlife than in some national parks and therefore they are suffering losses of lives and properties," said Yam Bahadur Malla, country director for the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) in Nepal.

He also suggested it was necessary to scientifically demarcate the boundaries of national parks, as some species involved in the attacks were sometimes found outside the existing boundaries.

Forest ministry officials, however, said the chances of expanding existing protected areas were very slim because Nepal had already made huge swathes of land available for nature conservation.

Mr Acharya said the details of plans to limit wildlife growth were yet to be worked out but he added that one of the ideas would be to relocate some of the wildlife species.

"We have listed nine such species that can be trans-located from where there are quite many of them to where there are very few and such species include animals involved in conflicts with humans," he said.

Mr Acharya also hinted that Nepal will now not commit to protect more wildlife than the amount its protected areas could sustain.

"For instance, we have said we will double the number of tigers to 250. But as we cannot expand our protected areas, we will not be able to commit more than that," he said.

"Nor can we add new conservation areas."

Source: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-21069750#sa-ns_mchannel=rss&ns_source=PublicRSS20-sa

the fray national anthem dallas tornado ncaa basketball oikos kentucky wildcats oakland school shooting nike nfl jerseys